Featured Post

Lab report for synthesis of polystyrene Essay Example

Lab report for combination of polystyrene Paper Every monomer is fused into the polymer is known as a recurrent unit or monomer buildup. ...

Tuesday, May 5, 2020

Management And Organizations Environment â€Myassignmemthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Management And Organizations In Global Environment? Answer: Introducation According to Thomas Friedman the world has experienced three different eras. The first era of globalization happened when countries colonized other countries. For example British colonized India or Germans colonized many European countries. The multinational organizations initiated the second era of the globalisation. The digital revolution brought the third where the globalization is focused on individuals. Though all the nations are connected through the globalization, the cultural conflicts will rise as well. Every nation, culture or organization does not possess enough knowledge about other cultures which will cause the conflicts. The cultural conflicts will have negative impact on the businesses. According to Friedman because of the internet revolution the world is flat; however one needs to investigate more before approving it completely. It cannot be denied the definition is more appropriate for the developed world. There are many parts of the world where the people do not have internet access. The cultural, social or ethical value of individual is different which prevents the world to be entirely flat. In Friedmans discussion internet is the main deciding factor but it should not be, as there are many other factors other than the internet which should be considered. The internet has limited the world to common space where the interactions among individuals are increasing. However it cannot be concluded that just because of this every individual is globalised. This has opened up possibilities for the multi nation al companies to business all over the world. They see more destinations where the business can expand but to achieve the individual globalization they have to go a long way. Ghemawat explained in his book World 3.0 the world is far from becoming individually globalised. Ghemawat has contradicted Friedman by saying that the sudden change the internet brought over influenced him and the theory and conclusion he proposed lack adequate scientific data. He believed that the large investment, communication and immigration have been improved because of the globalization but there are many gaps that still exist. Hofstede defined cultural dynamics in the following six frameworks: Power Distance: This dimension is based upon the interdependence among the members of a community. The individualistic society focuses on I where a collectivist society focuses on We. If a certain society scores low it needs to focus more on the collective method in order to resolve those issues. How a community or nations focuses on long term or short term planning and relationship, this dimension decides that. Indulgence: The community works effectively by their ability to value each others perspectives and accept that. This is very significant for a company in the era of third globalization. The country needs to be internally forceful in order to deal with that. Professor McSweenys views on immigration have influenced to a large extent. The fundamentals of nations have been transformed by immigration and culture. However a nation cannot be identified by a single culture as there can be many cultures within one society. At the same time an individual culture or single subculture cannot define the whole. However personal beliefs and perspectives should be respected by every responsible individual. The example of Mr. Trompenaar is particularly significant here. He was having troubles with the management and his colleagues because he used to approach the management directly if any issue occurred with the customer. Most of the time he failed to expresses his explanations clearly to the management. The management had given him some rights and liberty which allowed him to offer discounts to the customers. After that there were no problems and this resulted in 30 % increase in the company profit. Peoples acceptability of a specific society defines the low context or high context culture. In the high context culture the things are generally simple and small but in the low context culture there exist complex behaviors and emotions. For example in a project or meeting the Indians express low context but the Americans express high context culture. Organisational culture The organizational culture can be defined by the way one organization works. The hierarchical structure of the organization is maintained by the organizational conducts. The employee mentality, impact of stories on the staff, power structure, framework control, authoritative structure, schedules, images and customs work in the development of the hierarchical culture. The organizational stories are created by the discussion that the employees have inside or outside the organization. The organizations well being is reflected on the stories. Ingvar Kamprad is considered as a legend because of his creation of IKEA. His strategies and concepts entirely changed the IKEA operations. The daily actions of the workers within the organizational work flow are accepted by everyone. Many examples can be drawn in IKEAs organizational culture, like the employees travelling by economy class or bus or his staying in hotels during business trips. The blue colored casual dresses can be worn by the employees at the work place. The symbol is an important part of the organizational culture. The symbols of an organization can be expressed in many ways like the dress code or the company logo or any sign that the company uses officially. The color of the IKEA employee dresses is blue which symbolizes the color of the national flag of Sweden. The company also maintains the Swedish side by providing play corners or scales, pencils and papers. Thorough this, value of the worker is defined in written or unwritten manner. The strategic role can be played by the organizational culture as well. IKEA follows an organizational structure which is non-horizontal in nature. The management maintains the Anti Bureaucrat week every different management level work collaboratively on the same level. There is various control systems are at work in any organizational structure. Quality system, reward system, HR system and financial system are part of the organisational control system. IKEA works its best to reduce its product cost without compromising quality. IKEA make sure that the stores with better service and low cost receives the rewards. Management maintains a close relationship with the employees in order to enhance the quality. The top management mostly takes the important organizational decisions and most of the time they are only few people. An effective organization everyones right is well protected. IKEA has become more open and adaptive as now more number of cultural diverse people work for the company Reference Anon, Geert Hofstede. The hofstedecentre. Available at: https://geert-hofstede.com/countries.html [August 24, 2017]. Arno Christian, 2011. Building A Cross-cultural Web Design For A Wider Audience. Onextrapixel. Available at: https://www.onextrapixel.com/2010/06/22/building-a-cross-cultural-web-design-for-a-wider-audience/ [August 24, 2017]. Burt, S., Johansson, U. and Thelander, ., 2011. Standardized marketing strategies in retailing? IKEAs marketing strategies in Sweden, the UK and China.Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services,18(3), pp.183-193. Colin Davies, Managing Director at C21 Consulting Ltd Follow, 2012. Cultural web. LinkedIn SlideShare. Available at: https://www.slideshare.net/c21colindavies/cultural-web [August 24, 2017]. Duncker, E., Sheikh, J.A. and Fields, B., 2013, July. From global terminology to local terminology: A review on cross-cultural interface design solutions. InInternational Conference on Cross-Cultural Design(pp. 197-207). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Friedman, J., 2004. Globalization.A Companion to the Anthropology of Politics, pp.179-197. Friedman, T., 2005. The world is flat: A brief history of the globalized world in the 21st century.London: Allen Lane. Ghemawat, P., Actually, the world isn't flat. PankajGhemawat: Actually, the world isn't flat | TED Talk | TED.com. Available at: https://www.ted.com/talks/pankaj_ghemawat_actually_the_world_isn_t_flat.html [August 24, 2017]. Guillotin, B. and Mangematin, V., 2015. Internationalization Strategies of Business Schools: How Flat Is the World?.Thunderbird International Business Review,57(5), pp.343-357. Khamis, S., 2016. Brand IKEA in a Global Cultural Economy: A Case Study.Consumer Culture: Selected Essays. Larsson, A. and Schiehle, S., 2016. The Effects of Diversity on Multinational Organisations: An exploratory case study investigating the cross-cultural management and organisational culture of IKEA. Peters, M.E., 2015. Open trade, Closed Borders Immigration in the era of Globalization.World Politics,67(1), pp.114-154.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.